Talk:The Fox and the Cat (fable)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Fox and the Cat (fable) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Princeton University old rusty.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Princeton University old rusty.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reloaded from UK CommonsMzilikazi1939 (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tags Reply

This article has some massive problems: There are almost no secondary sources cited, and it seems as a result to be entirely based on original research. The central thesis of this article — the supposed interrelation of these fables -- is not, so far as I can tell, attributed to/found in any source whatsoever. I seem to have stepped on toes by tagging, sorry, but this has to be fixed and reverting tags won't work. GordonGlottal (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]